(216) 609-3940
SandRun Risk
  • Home
  • What We Do
    • Risk Management
    • Insurance Claims
    • Insurance Archaeology
  • Blog
  • About
    • Team
    • Our Company
    • Articles
  • Contact

A 2021 Look at Bankruptcy Trust and Transparency Issues in Asbestos Litigation, Part I: The Evolution of the Bankruptcy Trust System

6/6/2021

3 Comments

 
Picture

The authors of this guest essay, Evelyn Fletcher Davis and William T. Wood, III are partners in the Atlanta office of Hawkins Parnell & Young, LLP, where their practices focus on asbestos litigation defense. This three-part guest article examines the evolution of the bankruptcy trust system (Part I), how control over the trust system by plaintiffs’ counsel has resulted in unfair allocations of responsibility, double recoveries and excessive costs (Part II), and offers practical advice to defense counsel to fix the disconnect between the tort and trust systems (Part III).

​Asbestos liabilities have driven six more companies in the United States to file bankruptcy petitions since the beginning of 2020: ON Marine Services Co. LLC, Paddock Enterprises, LLC, DBMP LLC, Aldrich Pump LLC/Murray Boiler LLC,Garrett Motion Inc., and Cyprus Mines Corporation. The new petitions add additional chapters to the lengthy story that continues to be the asbestos litigation machine. To date, there have been over 130 asbestos-related bankruptcies.

Many of the companies that have declared bankruptcy due, at least in part, to asbestos-related liabilities have created trusts to pay for alleged harms caused by exposure to their products. Approximately sixty bankruptcy trusts are presently in operation, and claimants today typically file claims with numerous trusts for alleged harms caused by the bankrupt companies’ asbestos products. Because of the way the bankruptcy trusts are set up and operate—primarily by attorneys who represent asbestos plaintiffs—those same attorneys have been able to litigate cases against new or formerly peripheral asbestos defendants without accounting for the trust entities’ responsibility for causing their clients’ injuries or the amounts their clients recover from the trusts.

​This has resulted in duplicative recoveries for plaintiffs—and their attorneys—and forces the current generation of asbestos defendants to bear costs far out of proportion to their share of responsibility. While some jurisdictions have acted to address those abuses of the tort system, they persist in most states, draining the resources of defendants and forcing some companies to file bankruptcy.

I. How the Bankruptcy Trust System Evolved

Back in the 1980s, asbestos manufacturing giant Johns-Manville Corporation entered bankruptcy and pioneered what was then a “radical new use of bankruptcy law.” Manville sought to establish and fund a qualified settlement trust that would pay both current claimants and also future asbestos claimants that were exposed to Manville products and may seek compensation for their injuries over the next several decades. In 1994, Congress amended Section 524 of the Bankruptcy Code to add a new subsection that offered the “Manville solution” to other companies similarly burdened with asbestos liabilities. By 2002, virtually every major producer of asbestos products had availed itself of that opportunity. 

While the trust mechanism established by Bankruptcy Code § 524(g), on its face, may appear to envision an objectively neutral process of compensating injured claimants, the implementation of the statute has been anything but neutral. A landmark study of asbestos bankruptcy trusts by RAND showed that a disproportionate number of key trust personnel positions were filled by plaintiff attorneys. A more recent analysis revealed that the top five asbestos plaintiff firms had “significantly increased” their membership on Trust Advisory Committees since the RAND study. As one commentator explains:
The dynamics of the bankruptcy process tend to lead to trust agreements and TDPs [Trust Distribution Procedures] that are largely written by counsel for the asbestos claimants themselves. After the debtor and competing creditor constituencies reach agreement with the asbestos creditors on the broad terms of the division of the assets of the debtor’s financial estate, there is little incentive for them to become involved in deciding how asbestos claimants choose to divide their own piece of the economic pie. * * *
The asbestos claimants and their contingency-fee attorneys have a strong incentive to design “user-friendly” TDPs that easily dispense funds in order to permit claimants to withdraw as much money as possible from the trusts as quickly as possible. Moreover, the selection of the trustees and members of the trust advisory committees (TACs) that oversee the operation of the trusts is heavily influenced, if not controlled outright, by counsel for the asbestos claimants.

In some instances, multiple bankruptcy trusts are administered by the same claims processing company, and, as a result, this consolidation has streamlined the process of submitting claims to multiple trusts at the same time. In addition, most bankruptcy trusts do not limit the ability of plaintiffs’ attorneys to recoup their normal contingency fee percentage from trust payments despite the administrative nature of the claim submission process.

Summary of Part I and Preview of Part II:​

More than 130 companies have filed for bankruptcy due to asbestos-related liabilities. Bankruptcy trusts are primarily set up and operated by attorneys who represent asbestos plaintiffs. Part II will look at how the growing involvement of plaintiffs’ counsel has resulted in unfair allocations of responsibility, double recoveries and excessive costs.

Picture
Picture
Picture

3 Comments
Arnav sharma link
6/13/2022 12:14:21 pm

very Good… i really like your blog…

Reply
Pinkham & Associates link
6/13/2022 12:15:36 pm

A landmark study of asbestos bankruptcy trusts by RAND showed that a disproportionate number of key trust personnel positions were filled by plaintiff attorneys. Thank you, amazing post!

Reply
Moshtael Family Law link
6/13/2022 12:41:45 pm

Approximately sixty bankruptcy trusts are presently in operation, and claimants today typically file claims with numerous trusts for alleged harmscaused by the bankrupt companies’ asbestos products. Thank you for the beautiful post!

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Authors

    Lori Siwik and Mark Siwik are the founders of SandRun Risk.  They apply the principles of vertical leadership and lean six sigma to the discipline of risk management.  From time to time they share their blog with guest authors who write about important risk management principles.

    Categories

    All
    Insurance Claims
    Mergers And Acquisitions
    Risk Management

    Archives

    March 2023
    February 2023
    May 2022
    December 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    March 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014

    Categories

    All
    Insurance Claims
    Mergers And Acquisitions
    Risk Management

    RSS Feed

What We Do.

Risk Management
Insurance Claims
Insurance Archaeology

Blog.

About.

Team
Our Company
Articles

Contact.

Legal.

Privacy
Terms of Use
 
Copyright ©2014 | 4199 Kinross Lakes Parkway, Ste. 275 Richfield, Ohio 44286 | 216-609-3940 | [email protected]