(216) 609-3940
SandRun Risk
  • Home
  • What We Do
    • Risk Management
    • Insurance Claims
    • Insurance Archaeology
  • Blog
  • About
    • Team
    • Our Company
    • Articles
  • Contact

A Risk Management Primer for Business Leaders – Part X (Social Physics)

6/12/2018

0 Comments

 
Picture

​Our recent columns explored the risk management approach of Paul O’Neill and Stanley McChrystal and the architecture of institutional learning systems which are a form of distributive networks.  What can the emerging science on human behavior in distributive networks teach us about the future of risk management?

"The world really has to go through this transition from being organized around efficiency and repetition, think assembly line, to a world where the real value comes from contributing to change.  That requires a different way of organizing – fluid, open teams of teams. And it requires a different set of skills – empathy, teamwork, a very different type of leadership and changemaking."

- Bill Drayton, Interview with the Smithsonian, April 19, 2013

Our last few columns focused on how organizational models for risk management are shifting away from hierarchical systems to distributive networks that resemble a hive or communal mind. A hive or communal mind is a dense network of human intelligence that resembles a fishnet that allows a better flow of knowledge and information throughout the network than what is possible in a hierarchical system. The hive/communal mind or distributive network is what Paul O’Neill and Stanley McChrystal helped their organizations (Alcoa and Joint Special Operations Task Force) become.

What can science teach us about how to help more business leaders build distributive networks for managing risk.  Better understanding human behavior and the flow of ideas between people started two centuries ago with Auguste Comte, the founder of sociology.  Compte coined the term “social physics” after concluding that mathematical tools from various sciences (physics, statistics, biology etc.) could be used to analyze human interaction.  In our view, some of the best work in the field of “social physics” has occurred in the last 20 years at the M.I.T. Media Lab which is led by Alex Pentland.

Pentland’s career focus began in the 1970s when he was a student at the University of Michigan.  While there, Pentland worked on a project that studied Canada’s beaver population by tracking the animal’s movements throughout the country.   That project helped spark ideas for Pentland’s current work.  Instead of analyzing animal behavior, Pentland and his graduate students attach sensors to people to study their patterns of communication and movement in work settings.  With the invention of the cellphone, the most ubiquitous sensor available, social physics now operates in the world of big data which brings an ability to measure the flow of ideas and knowledge through mathematical analysis of communication and transactions.

Pentland’s research proves that the best environments for risk-related decision-making are distributive networks that exhibit high levels of both engagement and exploration.  Engagement is a measure of social learning – that is, how often people in a group communicate with each other.  High engagement leads to faster development of behavioral norms and increased social pressure to enforce those norms.  Exploration measures the frequency by which people seek out new potentially valuable ideas by building and mining various parts of the distributive network or diverse social networks.
​
Pentland’s research is summarized in his book entitled Social Physics, How Good Ideas Spread – The Lessons from a New Science (2014).  At bottom, the objective of social physics is to improve the process for pooling ideas in a way that feeds back the best current idea for implementation or what we sometimes call “wisdom of the crowd.”  A key component to the “wisdom of the crowd” approach to risk management is making sure that there is sufficient diversity in the crowd to allow knowledge to surface from unexpected places.
​
Pentland’s thesis is illustrated in the diagram below which depicts the typical traditional model of risk management on the left and the emerging model of risk management on the right.
Picture
The difference in productivity is caused, in part, by an imbalance between engagement and exploration.  High engagement, alone, leads to homogenous groups (example A) that tend toward one way, less frequent communications that resemble a publish-subscribe model that can result in echo chambers, tribalism and a herd mentality.  This kind of behavior has produced a variety of undesirable risks ranging from stock market bubbles to ethnic violence and genocide.  In contrast, a balanced approach (example B) leads to a more diverse group with two-way communications flowing from a peer-to-peer model that (i) yields a larger number of ideas, (ii) facilitates dense interaction that serves to validate or invalidate ideas and build consensus, and (iii) promotes diversity to allow ideas to be found in unexpected places.  

In sum, the pattern of idea flow within an organization is perhaps the single biggest factor to determining whether an organization will resemble a distributive network that ensures the organization ​will “learn to thrive” – the goal of risk management.  Our next column focuses on the emerging science supporting a leadership approach that is so critical to building distributive networks.
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Authors

    Lori Siwik and Mark Siwik are the founders of SandRun Risk.  They apply the principles of vertical leadership and lean six sigma to the discipline of risk management.  From time to time they share their blog with guest authors who write about important risk management principles.

    Categories

    All
    Insurance Claims
    Mergers And Acquisitions
    Risk Management

    Archives

    March 2023
    February 2023
    May 2022
    December 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    March 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014

    Categories

    All
    Insurance Claims
    Mergers And Acquisitions
    Risk Management

    RSS Feed

What We Do.

Risk Management
Insurance Claims
Insurance Archaeology

Blog.

About.

Team
Our Company
Articles

Contact.

Legal.

Privacy
Terms of Use
 
Copyright ©2014 | 4199 Kinross Lakes Parkway, Ste. 275 Richfield, Ohio 44286 | 216-609-3940 | [email protected]