(216) 609-3940
SandRun Risk
  • Home
  • What We Do
    • Risk Management
    • Insurance Claims
    • Insurance Archaeology
  • Blog
  • About
    • Team
    • Our Company
    • Articles
  • Contact

CNA Financial Corp. May Be Obligated to Defend Asbestos Suits

6/6/2021

0 Comments

 
Picture

​The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals recently affirmed that the “duty to defend” is broad and as long as there are allegations that “arguably” implicate the policyholder, the insurance company’s duty to defend is triggered.

In a ruling dated May 21, 2021, the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously reversed the decision of the District Court and held that Continental Insurance Company (“Continental”) (part of CNA Financial Corp.) may be obligated to defend asbestos lawsuits filed against Daiken Applied Americas Inc (“Daiken Applied”). 

Continental issued comprehensive general liability policies to McQuay, Inc., later named McQuay-Perfex from January 1, 1967 to January 1, 1982 (collectively McQuay-Perfex”). These policies required Continental “to defend any suit against [McQuay-Perfex] seeking damages on account of bodily injury… even if any of the allegations of the suit are groundless, false or fraudulent.” Thereafter, McQuay-Perfex underwent a series of corporate restructuring events and eventually was named Daiken Applied.

Daiken Applied was named in almost 100 asbestos lawsuits and sought coverage under the Continental policies. Continental accepted tender of the lawsuits but reserved rights to disclaim any duty to defend or indemnify. It then filed suit and sought a ruling that it was only obligated to defend a suit that “specifically” alleged that Daiken Applied was sued for McQuay-Perfex liabilities. U.S. District Judge Frank ruled in favor of Continental.

The Eighth Circuit recognized that an insured could meet its threshold burden to trigger the insurer’s duty to defend in one of two ways.  
  • First, it can show that at least one claim in an underlying complaint against it “is ‘arguably within the policy’s scope’” based on the allegations in the complaint. See Westfield Ins. v. Miller Architects & Builders, 949 F.3d 403, 405 (8th Cir. 2020) (brackets omitted) (quoting Jostens, Inc. v. Mission Ins., 387 N.W.2d 161, 165 (Minn. 1986)); Haarstad v. Graff, 517 N.W.2d 582, 584 (Minn. 1994) (“The general rule is that the insurer’s duty to defend is determined by considering the allegations of the complaint in light of the relevant policy language.”). When determining whether a claim is “arguably” within the policy’s scope, the reviewing court must construe the complaint “liberally.” Home Ins. v. Nat’l Union Fire Ins. of Pittsburgh, 658 N.W.2d 522, 535 (Minn. 2003); cf. Prahm v. Rupp Constr. Co., 277 N.W.2d 389, 390 (Minn. 1979) (noting that “ambiguity” is resolved in favor of finding a duty to defend). Second, the insured can come forward with extrinsic facts “within the insurer’s knowledge [that] clearly establish” that a covered claim is at issue in the underlying lawsuit. See Meadowbrook, Inc. v. Tower Ins., 559 N.W.2d 411, 418 n.19 (Minn. 1997).

​The Eighth Circuit then ruled that the District Court error heightened Daiken Applied’s burden by omitting the critical word “arguably.” The underlying complaints did not need to “specifically allege” facts that made the duty to defend obvious. As along as there were allegations that made it “arguable” that an insured liability was at issue, Continental’s duty to defend was triggered. Because the District Court had decided that Continental did not have a duty to defend Daiken Applied at all and applied the wrong standard, it failed to consider whether each of the 100 asbestos lawsuits triggered coverage for Daiken Applied. Accordingly, the case was sent back to the District Court to reconsider its ruling.

This decision is important for corporate policyholders who seek coverage under historic insurance policies for which they have rights to coverage but receive reservation of rights and other coverage objections from insurance carriers seeking to avoid their duty to defend.  ​

0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Authors

    Lori Siwik and Mark Siwik are the founders of SandRun Risk.  They apply the principles of vertical leadership and lean six sigma to the discipline of risk management.  From time to time they share their blog with guest authors who write about important risk management principles.

    Categories

    All
    Insurance Claims
    Mergers And Acquisitions
    Risk Management

    Archives

    May 2022
    December 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    March 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014

    Categories

    All
    Insurance Claims
    Mergers And Acquisitions
    Risk Management

    RSS Feed

What We Do.

Risk Management
Insurance Claims
Insurance Archaeology

Blog.

About.

Team
Our Company
Articles

Contact.

Legal.

Privacy
Terms of Use
 
Copyright ©2014 | 4199 Kinross Lakes Parkway, Ste. 275 Richfield, Ohio 44286 | 216-609-3940 | info@sandrunrisk.com