(216) 609-3940
SandRun Risk
  • Home
  • What We Do
    • Risk Management
    • Insurance Claims
    • Insurance Archaeology
  • Blog
  • About
    • Team
    • Our Company
    • Articles
  • Contact

Contribution Claims Cannot Reduce a Policyholder’s Recovery for “All Sums”

12/7/2014

0 Comments

 
Picture

An issue that comes up when negotiating a complex claim with insurance carriers in an “all sums” state, like Ohio, is the right of the carrier selected by the policyholder to seek contribution from other carriers whose policies have been triggered by the claim.

​In Ohio, per the Ohio Supreme Court decision in Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 95 Ohio St. 3d 512 (2002), when a policyholder selects an insurer to provide coverage for the claim, that insurer may seek contribution from other insurance carriers whose policies were triggered by the occurrence.

But what if the other triggered policies includes carriers who issued fronted policies or retrospective premium rated policies to the policyholder?  What if the other triggered policy years have significant deductibles or self-insured retentions to be paid by the policyholder?  Can a contribution claim be made which results in a reduction in the amount the policyholder receives for its claim? 


The answer is no.  Should contribution be sought against the other policies which are fronted policies or retrospective premium rated policies, or policies that have deductibles or self-insured retentions, the effect would be to impose loss back upon the policyholder, which defeats the policyholder’s right to recover “all sums” (all of its claim costs) for the claim.  Goodyear, Keene Corporation v. Insurance Company of North America, 667 F.2d 1034 (D.C. Cir. 1981), Manor Care, Inc. v. First Specialty Insurance Corp., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48249 (N.D. Ohio 2006), Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. American Centennial Ins. Co., 74 Ohio Misc. 2d 183 (Com. Pls. 1995); Millennium Chemicals, Inc., v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co., 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20974 (N.D. Ohio 2001) are all decisions that can be read to require that the policyholder receive payment of the “full amount of indemnity that is due”[1] and “complete security”[2] from each policy triggered by the occurrence without any reduction due to deductibles, self-insured retentions, fronted policies or retrospective premium rated policies. 

​The policyholder has the legal right to be made whole and a contribution claim cannot defeat that legal right.  Thus, in circumstances where a contribution claim is sought against fronted policies or retrospective premium rated policies, the contribution claim will not succeed.  Further, in circumstances where a contribution claim is sought against policies with deductibles or self-insured retentions, the policyholder will not be required to satisfy the deductibles or self-insured retentions. 


When negotiating asbestos, toxic tort, environmental or other “long-tail” insurance claims in an “all sums” state, it is important for companies to carefully review all of the triggered policies and select the best policy or policies for the allocation, taking into account the chosen carrier’s contribution rights and the impact of any claim for contribution that may be made by that carrier.  Discussing the contribution issue up front with the selected carrier can save time and money later.  Companies may want to hire an insurance coverage lawyer to assist in the analysis and discussions with the selected insurance carrier. 

I welcome your feedback.      

[1] Keene, 667 F.2d at 1050.
[2] Goodyear, 95 Ohio St. 3d at 516.
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Authors

    Lori Siwik and Mark Siwik are the founders of SandRun Risk.  They apply the principles of vertical leadership and lean six sigma to the discipline of risk management.  From time to time they share their blog with guest authors who write about important risk management principles.

    Categories

    All
    Insurance Claims
    Mergers And Acquisitions
    Risk Management

    Archives

    March 2023
    February 2023
    May 2022
    December 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    March 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014

    Categories

    All
    Insurance Claims
    Mergers And Acquisitions
    Risk Management

    RSS Feed

What We Do.

Risk Management
Insurance Claims
Insurance Archaeology

Blog.

About.

Team
Our Company
Articles

Contact.

Legal.

Privacy
Terms of Use
 
Copyright ©2014 | 4199 Kinross Lakes Parkway, Ste. 275 Richfield, Ohio 44286 | 216-609-3940 | [email protected]