(216) 609-3940
SandRun Risk
  • Home
  • What We Do
    • Risk Management
    • Insurance Claims
    • Insurance Archaeology
  • Blog
  • About
    • Team
    • Our Company
    • Articles
  • Contact

Insurance Coverage Trigger and Allocation

5/27/2018

1 Comment

 
Picture

In complex insurance claims, trigger and allocation theories affect the value of the claim. This article teaches what every corporate policyholder should know to maximize the value of their claim.

When faced with a toxic tort or environmental insurance claim, two key issues to address are trigger and  allocation. 

CGL policies require that some bodily injury or property damage alleged in the underlying claim occur during the  policy period to trigger coverage under the policy.  There are four trigger theories:  (1) exposure – triggers coverage in  effect during the period of exposure, beginning from a claimant’s first exposure to a harmful substance or first release of  a contaminant into the environment; (2) injury-in-fact – triggers coverage during the period that injury or damage  actually occurs, which in the case of latent injury claims may occur over several decades; (3) manifestation – triggers  coverage only when damage is actually manifested or discovered; and (4) continuous trigger – triggers coverage under  all policies in effect from first exposure through manifestation, including the injury-in-fact period.

There are two major allocations theories:  vertical allocation and horizontal (pro-rata) allocation. Under a vertical allocation, the claim is allocated to any triggered year (from the primary layer to all applicable excess policies). Under a  horizontal allocation, the claim is allocated to all or multiple triggered years. Courts have developed various formulas to  use for the horizontal allocation method.

Numerous jurisdictions, including Ohio, Indiana, Pennsylvania, etc., follow the vertical allocation methodology.  The courts rely on the “all sums” language in the policy that states that the policy responds to all sums the insured  incurs by reason of bodily injury or property damage.   That is, the policyholder and “pick and choose” which policy or policies will contribute to paying the claim. 

After the policyholder exhausts the chosen primary policy, it can proceed  against either an overlying policy or a primary policy in another triggered year.  Other jurisdictions (New Jersey, New  York, Colorado, etc.) support a horizontal allocation of the claim. With a horizontal allocation, courts apply several  schemes to apportion the claim to the triggered policies.  Some apportion the policyholder’s liability equally to each  insurance company on the risk during the triggered policy periods.  Others apportion the policyholder’s liability based  on the time each insurance company is on the risk, while others apportion the liability based on the policy limits. 

There are a number of factors that affect the allocation theory applied, whether it is a vertical or horizontal allocation.  Those factors include:
  • Deductibles, SIRs, retrospective rated policies
  • Aggregate limits or no aggregate limits
  • Self-insured periods and coverage gaps
  • Defense costs separate from indemnity costs
  • Choice of law uncertainties
  • Exhaustion by other claims
  • Attachment points
  • Occurrence limits
  • Insolvencies
  • Policy exclusions
  • Lost policies

When faced with a toxic tort or environmental claim, it is important to evaluate the trigger and allocation theories  in the jurisdictions which may apply to your claim.  These two theories can have a significant impact on the value of the  claim and the possible recovery for the policyholder.
1 Comment
Randy Graff
4/22/2019 03:55:38 pm

Do you really think Indiana has vertical exhaustion in light of the Thomson case?

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Authors

    Lori Siwik and Mark Siwik are the founders of SandRun Risk.  They apply the principles of vertical leadership and lean six sigma to the discipline of risk management.  From time to time they share their blog with guest authors who write about important risk management principles.

    Categories

    All
    Insurance Claims
    Mergers And Acquisitions
    Risk Management

    Archives

    May 2022
    December 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    March 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014

    Categories

    All
    Insurance Claims
    Mergers And Acquisitions
    Risk Management

    RSS Feed

What We Do.

Risk Management
Insurance Claims
Insurance Archaeology

Blog.

About.

Team
Our Company
Articles

Contact.

Legal.

Privacy
Terms of Use
 
Copyright ©2014 | 4199 Kinross Lakes Parkway, Ste. 275 Richfield, Ohio 44286 | 216-609-3940 | info@sandrunrisk.com