(216) 609-3940
SandRun Risk
  • Home
  • What We Do
    • Risk Management
    • Insurance Claims
    • Insurance Archaeology
  • Blog
  • About
    • Team
    • Our Company
    • Articles
  • Contact

Risk: A Primer for Business Leaders – Part VIII (Complicated & Complex Uncertainty)

4/5/2019

0 Comments

 
Picture

​Risk is a seemingly simple word that confounds most organizations when it comes to achieving strategic outcomes. We prefer the word uncertainty.  Increasingly, the role of business leaders will be to help others in their organizations learn how to frame, evaluate and communicate uncertainty – especially the type of uncertainty that is complicated or complex.

“In my experience, almost every risk problem of consequence falls into the realm of complexity.  The problem is that almost every risk management response is a complicated one.  Thus, there is a fundamental mismatch.”

- Rick Nason, Rethinking Risk Management, Critically Examining Old Ideas and New Concepts (2017)

The previous section introduced the Stacey matrix (depicted below) as a way to think about risk and uncertainty.  In a perfect world, stability, predictability, and consensus would be the norm such that every business problem would be resolved in simple and straightforward manner.  With simple risk and complicated risk, linear analysis (event A causes effect B) and rational decision-making is the norm.  In contrast, Stacey’s matrix helps us see that businesses also operate in a state of complexity - a dynamic, fast paced environment where a different set of skills and alternative decision-making processes is needed.

Picture
That is, the matrix helps us visualize that decision-making in state of complexity is increasingly more difficult and even harder than complicated risk.

Since the Industrial Revolution, business leaders have largely focused on complicated risk.  Led by the scientist and engineer Frederick Taylor whose thinking would be adopted by global companies (Toyota, Ford and many others), the objective has been to define, measure and improve production.  Efficiency experts devise a solution and launch it, believing that the solution is whole, complete, actionable, and replicable.  Efficiency also works best with risks that are known, obvious and actionable.  Consequently, traditional risk management consists of a three-step approach to address uncertainty: identify the risk (predict/forecast); quantify the risk (assess/measure); and control the risk (plan/treat/mitigate).  

This approach to complicated risk has worked reasonably well.  Think back to the 20th century when the engineering skill used to design machines (steam engines, trains, tractors and automobiles) replaced muscles and animals as the dominant factors of production.  Naturally, the role of the human as a doer shifted to one of manager.  Muscle became a commodity that was less valuable than the knowledge and skill (think engineering) to engage in complicated thinking.  

The work landscape is changing once again.  The skill to engage in complicated thinking is now becoming commoditized in a hyper-connected world that is changing both people and the environment.  The rise of personalized technology means a global system of nearly eight billion human touch points that can interact locally, nationally, and globally.  No longer is it safe to assume that employees, managers, and business leaders come from the same setting or that they resemble each other. 

​Global inner-connectivity is also changing the environment.  No longer can we say that one solution that works in a given setting is guaranteed to work for another.  This makes matters of risk management and corporate governance complex rather than complicated because solutions are not necessarily replicable and transferable.

​Going forward, business leaders will need to understand and be skilled at both complicated thinking and complex thinking.  In fact, one could argue that there is a skill progression in learning how to handle different types of uncertainty as envisioned below:  
Picture
An apt analogy might be the evolution of Pablo Picasso’s artistic career.  Picasso learned to paint the traditional way – what we might call simple or complicated uncertainty in risk management.  Over time, Picasso’s art shifted to the abstract. Risk management, being as much art as science, can be viewed similarly.  Pumping crude oil from below the ocean’s surface, making an electric car, or manufacturing a reusable rocket are all valuable endeavors.  But even though they are complicated tasks; once you figure out how to do these things, you can keep doing them and improve over time.  On the other hand, merging two companies or figuring out how the market will react to a new product or strategy is a complex challenge.  There are no rules, algorithms or natural laws that provide a degree of order, control or predictability.

We believe that a sensible approach is to start with traditional risk management – a world dominated by insurance driven solutions – before tackling the more abstract levels of managing complexity.   We also believe that risk intelligence (i.e., how to live and thrive in uncertainty) is both individual and collective.  The next few sections will further explore uncertainty from the individual perspective.
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Authors

    Lori Siwik and Mark Siwik are the founders of SandRun Risk.  They apply the principles of vertical leadership and lean six sigma to the discipline of risk management.  From time to time they share their blog with guest authors who write about important risk management principles.

    Categories

    All
    Insurance Claims
    Mergers And Acquisitions
    Risk Management

    Archives

    March 2023
    February 2023
    May 2022
    December 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    March 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014

    Categories

    All
    Insurance Claims
    Mergers And Acquisitions
    Risk Management

    RSS Feed

What We Do.

Risk Management
Insurance Claims
Insurance Archaeology

Blog.

About.

Team
Our Company
Articles

Contact.

Legal.

Privacy
Terms of Use
 
Copyright ©2014 | 4199 Kinross Lakes Parkway, Ste. 275 Richfield, Ohio 44286 | 216-609-3940 | [email protected]