(216) 609-3940
SandRun Risk
  • Home
  • What We Do
    • Risk Management
    • Insurance Claims
    • Insurance Archaeology
  • Blog
  • About
    • Team
    • Our Company
    • Articles
  • Contact

The Future of Enterprise Risk Management in the Age of Pandemics and Cyber Crime: Part IV - Total Engagement and the Whole of Organization Concept

9/8/2020

0 Comments

 
Picture

​We live in a world that is becoming increasingly intertwined and interdependent which means that complex risks such as pandemics and cyber crime are here to stay. Consequently, the future of ERM will be concerned with building “whole of organization” approaches that meet specific opportunities or challenges with the end goal being the creation of shareable and scalable solutions. 

“Economic change in all periods depends more than most economists think on what people believe.” - J. Mokyr, The Enlightened Economy.  An Economic History of Britain, 1700-1850, p. 1 (2010) (emphasis added).

The preceding sections discussed the indispensability of senior leadership that helps their organizations build the necessary ERM infrastructure to pursue opportunities and absorb the shocks of doing business in an increasingly intertwined and interdependent world. Now we turn to the next subject which is how to make ERM a collective endeavor that elicits total engagement throughout the organization. Getting buy-in across an organization (i.e., a whole of organization response) brings to mind the story about the  first faculty meeting of the University of Chicago in 1892. William Rainey Harper, the school’s first president, asked everyone to pursue the goal of “how to become one in spirit, not necessarily one in opinion.” (D. M. Randel, A University’s Lexicon, The University of Chicago Magazine, Vol 93, No. 2 (December 2000)).

ERM has been slow to gain traction in facilitating total engagement because too often it gets separated from the spirit of the organization and what drives and motivates people. For ERM to have value, it has to be perceived as being connected to doing real things that matter. Otherwise, ERM will be seen as an empty and useless abstraction - as just words. To avoid this perception, ERM needs to align with and support work that is viewed as having a specific and compelling purpose. What is regarded as specific and compelling is a matter of what people believe. Furthermore, whole of organization (i.e., enterprise wide) responses are not feasible unless the specific and compelling purpose is a shared belief.

An era in history that offers insight as to what we mean by the power of a shared belief is the Industrial Revolution that began in England in early to mid-18th century and would spread to the rest of the world. The question pondered by scholars is why England (and not France, the Netherlands, China, India or another country) was the first economy to shift away from a largely rural agrarian society in which work was performed by individuals and small workshops (e.g., individual spinners, weavers, and dyers). What caused English society - both the intellectual class and the working class - to support the creation of textile factories and mechanized production and other industries such as iron and steel production?

The leading hypothesis is attributed to Joel Mokyr, an economic historian that has taught at Northwestern University since 1974. In his book, The Enlightened Economy:  An Economic History of Britain 1700 to 1850 (2010), Mokyr theorizes that the Industrial Revolution was a product of a change in the belief structures of the English people, not a change in their circumstances. More specifically, Mokyr suggests that two different ideas took hold in Britain. The first shift in British thinking was that acquiring knowledge through science and reason is a cumulative exercise that was as compelling as the pursuit of salvation. The second shift in British thinking was that advances in science and reasoning should be used to bring the greatest happiness to the greatest number of people. Accordingly, both the British elite and craftsmen with limited formal education were aligned on the application of science and knowledge to problems and the collective pursuit of technological improvements that would make life easier and better for all of British society. This led to a unique culture of experimentation and innovation to be contrasted with what Mokyr calls “rent-seeking” which he defines as the use of power to redistribute rather than create opportunity and wealth.

Mokyr’s thesis is relevant to the future of ERM - especially to what we call “positive risk” which is the effort made to increase the probability of magnitude of good things happening. To be relevant, ERM needs to encourage and support the organization’s engagement with positive risk which in practical terms mean people believing that they have the freedom to experiment and try new things. This requires the development of ERM structures and processes that are permissive and encouraging as opposed to being overly cautious and slow to make decisions. Permissive and encouraging structures yield a culture of innovation yet much of what happens in the name of risk management produces a culture that resists and impedes innovation.

What belief structures are integral to ERM supporting a culture of innovation? Matt Ridley’s latest book, How Innovation Works, and Why It Flourishes in Freedom (2020) offers a number of insights and recommendations. Ridley explains that innovation is different than invention in that innovation is the process of taking an idea and turning it into workable, affordable product or service that actually delivers benefits to people. Furthermore, innovation is not the work of a lonely genius sitting at the top of the organization but the product of a teamwork and collaboration at the bottom of the organization. It is a matter of unleashing the creative collaborative spirit of employees to do the 50,000 experiments that Edison said it took to develop the nickel-iron battery.

Ridley’s book offers a number of suggestions to keep in mind in designing and implementing an ERM system that fosters a culture of innovation:
  1. Innovation is gradual. It is often a hard slog that requires years of experimentation and learning. Developing people who can find ways to drive down costs and simplify the product or service is essential.
  2. Innovation is recombinant. Ideas and technologies are a recombination of other ideas and other technologies.  As such, diversity matters because people need the freedom to meet and exchange ideas and concepts.
  3. Innovation is often serendipitous and requires considerable trial and error. Tolerance of failure and error in an ERM model is a must in order to give people the opportunity and room to make the unexpected discoveries and then develop the stamina to gradually improve new ideas through experimentation.
  4. Innovation is a team sport and a collaborative phenomenon. One person comes up with the idea, another person designs the manufacturing process, and third figures out how to make the new product or service affordable.
  5. Innovation prefers fragmented governance. History teaches us that as organizations grow and central power begins to ossify, they become less efficient, less manageable, less frugal, and they resist novelty and eccentricity.  
  6. Innovation requires more patience and less hype. Ridley believes that we expect too much of innovation in the first 10 years and too little in the first 20 years, but generally get it right looking 15 years ahead.
​In sum, the future of ERM needs to be partly tied to thinking about how to better improve our shared beliefs  so that people feel that they have the freedom to think, experiment, and speculate about the future. Human history, as Ridley argues, has been steadily moving away from riskier forms of self-sufficiency to safer forms of mutual interdependence. Freedom is one half of the equation for healthy mutual interdependence. In the next section, we will look at the counterbalance to freedom - minimization of harm to others.

0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Authors

    Lori Siwik and Mark Siwik are the founders of SandRun Risk.  They apply the principles of vertical leadership and lean six sigma to the discipline of risk management.  From time to time they share their blog with guest authors who write about important risk management principles.

    Categories

    All
    Insurance Claims
    Mergers And Acquisitions
    Risk Management

    Archives

    May 2022
    December 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    March 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014

    Categories

    All
    Insurance Claims
    Mergers And Acquisitions
    Risk Management

    RSS Feed

What We Do.

Risk Management
Insurance Claims
Insurance Archaeology

Blog.

About.

Team
Our Company
Articles

Contact.

Legal.

Privacy
Terms of Use
 
Copyright ©2014 | 4199 Kinross Lakes Parkway, Ste. 275 Richfield, Ohio 44286 | 216-609-3940 | info@sandrunrisk.com