(216) 609-3940
SandRun Risk
  • Home
  • What We Do
    • Risk Management
    • Insurance Claims
    • Insurance Archaeology
  • Blog
  • About
    • Team
    • Our Company
    • Articles
  • Contact

The Tripartite Relationship – Avoiding Conflicts of Interest

10/22/2016

0 Comments

 
Picture

Policyholders need to be aware of potential conflicts of interest when their insurance carrier agrees to provide a defense of a claim presented to it. ​

A conflict of interest is created when there are competing goals of the parties involved: the insurance carrier, the policyholder, and defense counsel. 

While the policyholder is looking for the best defense available, the insurance carrier may be looking to save costs and pay out the least amount of money possible.

In several states, when the defense counsel, the policyholder and the insurance carrier are all involved in the defense of a claim, there is a tripartite relationship and both the policyholder and the insurance carrier are the “client.”  In other states, there is only “one-client” and that is the policyholder. See United States Fidelity & Guar. Co., v. Pietrykowski (Feb. 11, 2000), 2000 Ohio App. LEXIS 460, appeal not allowed, 89 Ohio St.3d 1430 (2000), where the court held that defense counsel’s primary allegiance is the policyholder.

Defense counsel owes a duty of undivided loyalty to the policyholder.  As a result, defense counsel cannot do anything that would harm the interests of the policyholder. For instance, if the insurance carrier seeks help from defense counsel to defeat coverage, defense counsel cannot breach its undivided loyalty to the policyholder to assist the insurance carrier.

A potential conflict of interest arises from insurance carrier litigation guidelines.  Defense counsel cannot permit the litigation guidelines to compromise the way he defends the claim. Insurance carriers cannot use their litigation guidelines to interfere with defense counsel’s professional judgment.

Another potential conflict of interest arises when the insurance carrier reserves its rights under the insurance policy.  The courts in some states have held that when an insurance carrier agrees to defend subject to a reservation of rights, there is an automatic duty to provide independent (cumis) counsel, who is selected by the policyholder, but paid for by the insurance carrier. 

In California, the legislature enacted California Civil Code §2860 which provides that if the provisions of a policy of insurance pose a duty to defend upon an insurance carrier and a conflict of interest arises which creates a duty on the part of the insurance carrier to provide independent counsel to the policyholder, the insurance carrier shall provide independent counsel to represent the policyholder unless the policyholder waives the right. 

The Alaska legislature enacted similar legislation (§21.89.100) in 1995.  Florida, too, enacted legislation (Florida Statute §627.426) that assumes a conflict of interest whenever the insurance carrier reserves its rights to deny coverage. 
​
Conflicts of interest is a matter of state law and must be carefully monitored to protect the policyholder and prevent defense counsel from committing ethics violations.
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Authors

    Lori Siwik and Mark Siwik are the founders of SandRun Risk.  They apply the principles of vertical leadership and lean six sigma to the discipline of risk management.  From time to time they share their blog with guest authors who write about important risk management principles.

    Categories

    All
    Insurance Claims
    Mergers And Acquisitions
    Risk Management

    Archives

    May 2022
    December 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    March 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014

    Categories

    All
    Insurance Claims
    Mergers And Acquisitions
    Risk Management

    RSS Feed

What We Do.

Risk Management
Insurance Claims
Insurance Archaeology

Blog.

About.

Team
Our Company
Articles

Contact.

Legal.

Privacy
Terms of Use
 
Copyright ©2014 | 4199 Kinross Lakes Parkway, Ste. 275 Richfield, Ohio 44286 | 216-609-3940 | info@sandrunrisk.com